It seems worthwhile to reblog the December 2007 post about the basics. Including “why the bioZhena technology had to be invented. One way of saying this is: The available means, methods or products, were not good enough. Another way of putting this is to quote from medical literature…”
And then see how none of the methods determined ovulation with the required accuracy to be useful either as a conception aid or especially for birth control.
Here is how our method (monitoring folliculogenesis in vivo) does it by generating the multi-featured cyclic profile that includes the definitive ovulation marker after the predictive signals, and here is how this compares with the older techniques. See how inaccurate is the ovulation assessment by the older means available to the users of NFP or FAM.
For more about the data in the above illustration, go see another old bioZhena post, “Regarding fetal sex preselection”, at http://biozhena.wordpress.com/2007/12/02/regarding-fetal-sex-preselection/ .
Originally posted on bioZhena's Weblog:
For these and other terms, see the Alphabet of bioZhena at /2007/11/28/the-alphabet-of-biozhena/
Not included in The Alphabet as yet is the motto found in the header of this blog. Rerum Naturare Feminina.
A Woman’s Natural Thing. In the lingua franca of the ancients.