And what is a parturition alarm?
For these and other entries, see the Alphabet of bioZhena at
https://biozhena.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/the-alphabet-of-biozhena/
Parturition alarm:
This is a concept that has to do with the need to know when labor or delivery is beginning, because the birthing female may be in need of help.
At the time of writing the first Alphabet draft more than five years ago, an Internet search produced only one such technology, a pressure-sensing girth, suitable for the horse breeder only, because it utilizes the fact that the horse mare lies on her side only in the process of parturition. To illustrate, we borrow a nice picture from a more recent publication found in today’s search on parturition alarm, which search still shows a preponderance of equine innovations:
In the originally noted publication, reference was made to some other method that would detect the emergence of the amniotic sac or of the foal from the vulva (vaginal orifice) but that was not a satisfactory solution. In the horse-breeding arena, about 5-6% of births require help. Various approaches to the birth alarm solution have been attempted.
These days, there are quite a few patents etc. found in the parturition alarm search. And even 5 years ago, a patent from New Mexico University should have been found because their intra-vaginal parturition alarm patent (basically for cows) was published in 1987.
In human obstetrics, where most births take place in hospitals, determining the right time of confinement would be very beneficial. bioZhena (and/or its sister company, bioPecus) will investigate our vaginal sensor technology – suitably modified – with a view to developing a parturition alarm applicable to any mammal.
Also relevant in this context is the implication of the Ovulona making available the menstrual cycle (folliculogenesis) data over many months or cycles before conception. This will enable a more accurate anticipation of the EDD, Expected Date of Delivery. You will understand this better below, under Parturition. I highly recommend that you check out Figuring Your Due Date, too – from the Midwife Archives.
Let us put it this way: Since this is the bioZhena blog (and not bioPecus, for veterinary tools), the EDD issue must be addressed first, before any parturition alarm developments. Because we are primarily concerned with the Rerum Naturare Feminina.
And it would still be of great interest to hear from an expert Latinist about the correct way of saying this in plural, the Natural Thing of Women, the Women’s Natural Thing…
This being a reference to /2007/12/16/cervix-uteri-and-seven-or-eight-related-things/ .
Parturition:
The process of giving birth; childbirth. [From Late Latin parturitio, from Latin parturitus, past participle of parturire, to be in labor.]
Parturition is illustrated at http://www.mhhe.com/biosci/esp/2001_saladin/folder_structure/re/m2/s5/ .
The illustration’s legend indicates that physicians usually calculate the gestation period (length of the pregnancy) as 280 days: 40 weeks or 10 lunar months from the last menstrual period (LMP) to the date of confinement, which is the estimated date of delivery of the infant [EDD].
Indubitably, due dates are a little-understood concept:
“Truth is, even if you know the exact date when you ovulated, you still can only estimate the baby’s unique gestational cycle to about plus or minus two weeks” [ http://www.gentlebirth.org/archives/dueDates.html ]. Why should that be? Because of the variability of your menstrual cycle lengths? (They vary even if you do not think so).
Statistically, the gestation time for human babies has a mean of 278 days and a standard deviation of 12 days, an uncomfortably large spread. The old Naegele Rule of a 40-week pregnancy was invented by a Bible-inspired botanist Harmanni Boerhaave in 1744 and later promoted by Franz Naegele in 1812. It is still believed to work fairly well as a rule of thumb for many pregnancies. However, the rule of thumb also suggests: “If your menstrual cycles are about 28 days, quite regular, and this is not your first child, your physician’s dating is probably fine. If your cycles are longer or irregular, or if this is your first child, the due date your physician has given you may be off, setting you up for all kinds of problems” (induction, interventions, C-section among them).
This is where the bioZhena technology can be expected to provide help, making it possible to reckon the EDD with recorded menstrual cycle (folliculogenesis history) data rather than merely with the LMP + 280 days. This, once properly researched, may be expected to have a significant impact on obstetric management. — Any comments?
It is ironic that, in this age of technological medicine, American women worry about their birthing process not being allowed to take its own natural course on account of an ancient method of predicting the EDD.
Ironically, the 40 week dogma – which is the gestational counterpart of the unacceptable calendar method of birth control (the so-called “Vatican roulette”) – does not reconcile the 295+ days of the 10 lunar months; and yet, at the same time, the U.S. has an unusually high perinatal death rate, resulting from high statistics of too early (preterm) labor. Quid agitur? See also under Gestation.
Dystocia or birthing difficulty:
Dystocia is difficult delivery, difficult parturition. From Latin dys-, bad, from Greek dus-, ill, hard + Greek tokos, delivery. Calf losses at birth result in a major reduction in the net calf crop. Data show that 60% of these losses are due to dystocia (defined as delayed and difficult birth) and at least 50% of these calf deaths could be prevented by timely obstetrical assistance. The USDA web site http://larrl.ars.usda.gov/physiology_history.htm is apparently no longer there but when it was it indicated that an electronic calving monitor was being developed to determine maternal and fetal stress during calving. These studies are important since they are leading the way for developing methods to reduce the $800 million calf and cow loss that occurs each year at calving in the USA’s beef herds.
In analogy with the superiority of in vivo monitoring of folliculogenesis versus tracking behavioral estrus (heat), in vivo monitoring of the progress towards parturition must be a priori a more promising approach.
The telemetric version of the BioMeter – the animal version of the Ovulona technology – will hopefully provide a tool for these efforts. Once tested on animals, human use will be a logical extension of the endeavor. (Or endeavour, should it take place in Europe! Smiley…)
Comment about the EDD and/or EDC issue, and request for input:
Again, EDD stands for Estimated Day of Delivery, while EDC stands for Estimated Day of Confinement.
Per Encyclopedia of Childhood and Adolescence, article Gestation Period and Gestational Age [ http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g2602/is_0002/ai_2602000272 ], ” a gestation period of thirty-eight weeks (266 days) is calculated for women who are pregnant by a procedure such as in vitro fertilization or artificial insemination that allows them to know their exact date of conception.”
The Ovulona device from bioZhena will provide to the woman user a very simple means to record the day of any intercourse. In every cycle, whether pregnancy is planned or not. This must become a part of the routine. The information will be electronically recorded along with the daily or almost-daily measurement data inherent in the use of the Ovulona. With that menstrual cycling history data, this intercourse-timing information will be available for optional use by the woman’s physician(s).
Therefore, the routine use of the Ovulona will provide for an equivalent of the above-referenced 38-week (266 days) calculation available to the women receiving IVF or artificial insemination.
This alone should be an improvement on the current way of EDD/EDC assessment.
In addition, an investigation should be undertaken into the question of whether any inference can be drawn from the woman’s menstrual cycle history prior to the conceptive intercourse. Any comments on this would be welcome, even about anecdotal or subjective or tentative observations that may be available already. However non-scientific, however tentative, however uncertain an individual answer or input from you may be…
E.g., do women with more or less regular cycles tend to exhibit a regular gestation period, and vice versa?
And, certainly, what evidence is available in medical literature (or maybe in unpublished records?) about the outcomes of the IVF and/or artificial insemination pregnancies, i.e., about their documented gestation periods? Does the 38 weeks projection work? Always? If not always, can anything be correlated with any deviation?
Do women with distinctly irregular menstrual cycles tend to have non-regular gestation periods?
The complicating effect of first versus subsequent pregnancy has already been noted, of course…
Conceivably, there is no such preliminary info available, and we shall have to try and gather even these preliminary data in a systematic manner, but – no question asked, nothing learned… Public or private input would be appreciated.
Tags: aid, ART, assisted reproductive technologies, at-home, awareness, baby, Billings, bio-electronic, bioelectrochemistry, biology, bioPecus, biophysical, biosensor, bioZhena, birth, birthday, birthing, business, BWE10, cervical, cervix, cervix uteri, colposcope, commercialization, company, conception, conceptive, consumer, contraception, control, COPE score, Corporation, Creighton, development, diagnosis, dystocia, EDD, electrochemistry, electronic, electronics, embryo, emerging, end-organ effect, endocrinology, entrepreneurship, epithelium, estimated day of delivery, FAM, family, fecundability, fecundity, female, fertility, fetal, fetus, follicular phase, folliculogenesis, fornix, founder, gender, gynecology, health, Hilgers, home, hormone, hot flash, hot flush, HRT, infertility, innocuous, intercourse, intravaginal, investment, KIrsner, last menstrual period, life, LMP, luteal phase, medical, medicine, menopause, Mortola, mucus, natural, NFP, non-chemical, obgyn, obstetrics, offering, opportunity, ovarian, ovary, ovulation, Ovulona, parturition, parturition alarm, peri-menopause, period, phase, physiology, placement, planning, PMDD, PMS, population, PPM, pregnancy, premenstrual, preselection, prevention, private, psychiatric instrument, psychoneuroendocrinology, psychosomatic, R&D, reduced, replacement, reproductive, research, science, scientist-entrepreneur, selection, self-diagnosis, self-help, sensor, sex, short luteal phase, sperm, start-up, startup, status, stress, sub-fertility, subfertility, subscription, syndrome, technology, therapy, timing, tissue, tool, Vaclav, Vaclav Kirsner, vaclavkirsner, vagina, vaginal, vaginal insert, venture, women's, zoology
May 30, 2009 at 4:36 am |
Hi,
I just wanted to confirm your article that the mean of human gestation period is 278 days. 278 = 2*139. If you know numerology (2=testimony, 139=creation), you can ascertain 100% that the mean gestation period is 278 and not 280 days!
Harri
January 19, 2010 at 7:50 am |
Between me and my husband we’ve tried more ways over the years than I can count, including high ferility positions, hormone enhancements, different times of the month, etc. But, the last few years I’ve narowwed it down to one type of treatment. Why? Because I was happy to discover how effective the results were.
May 27, 2010 at 12:50 pm |
If only I had a dime for each time I came to biozhena.wordpress.com.. Amazing read!
March 27, 2014 at 6:37 pm |
Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a
lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
I think that you can do with a few pics to drive the message home
a bit, but instead of that, this is magnificent blog. A great
read. I will certainly be back.